![]() The Nia’s screen is a bit nicer but not a huge amount compared to the 2011 Kobo Touch. The bigger difference was in generally navigating the user interface and reading where the Nia was much snappier to react. Surprisingly boot time was almost the same, start time from powered off the Nia took 28 seconds and Touch 30 seconds. Obviously the Nia battery will fall a lot faster if you keep it connected to Wi-Fi and use the light a lot. In terms of book storage the Nia has 8GB (roughly 6000 books) while the Touch has 2GB of which I’ve used 1.3GB.īattery life for both is still several weeks if Wi-Fi is off and lighting is off. The software is quite similar because to their credit Kobo still send updates to my ancient Kobo device. ![]() Both use micro usb for recharging or connecting to a computer to load up with ePubs, PDF’s etc. ![]() The Touch has a padded back feel while the Nia has a dotted pattern. The Touch has a button on the bottom front and also at the top left, while the Nia just has one button at centre bottom. So let’s see how the Nia that Kobo has lent me for a few days compares to the Kobo Touch I reviewed in 2011.įor starters Wi-Fi support is still only 2.4Ghz wifi. To be fair Amazon’s Kindle has been even slower than Kobo, generally copying new Kobo features later after analysing how popular they’ve been. When you consider how much mobile phones, computers and tablets have improved during the 2nd decade of this century it’s fair to say that Kobo and Amazon have been very slow to improve in comparison.īoth have made improvements over time especially to software but ereader hardware just hasn’t innovated much in the last decade beyond adding a light, waterproofing and being a bit faster. TypeGenius: 12 different fonts and over 50 font stylesĮxclusive font weight and sharpness settingsġ5 file formats supported natively (EPUB, EPUB3, FlePub, PDF, MOBI, JPEG, GIF, PNG, BMP, TIFF, TXT, HTML, RTF, CBZ, CBR)Įnglish, French, French (Canada), German, Spanish, Spanish (Mexico), Italian, Catalan, Portuguese, Portuguese (Brazil), Dutch, Danish, Swedish, Finnish, Norwegian, Turkish, Japanese, Traditional Chinese, Simplified Chinese Kobo Nia Specifications Screen:Ħ″ 212 PPI Carta E Ink display, 1024 × 758 resolutionĬomfortLight, a one-colour light with adjustable brightness The screen quality and sharpness difference is quite noticeable.Īnother difference is that the Nia has a built-in white/blue Comfortlight but the Clara HD has Comfortlight Pro which lets you switch between blue/white and a more yellow night light for more comfortable bed time or low light reading. Kobo Nia (2020) review average comparison since they aren't priced the same and more expensive products tend to get higher review scores from some sources.But wait! At a price of $149.95 the Nia is only $40 less than the Kobo Clara HD at $189.95 which has a substantially better 300ppi screen resolution versus the Nia’s 212ppi. ![]() There's one caveat here - it might not be entirely justifiable to do a direct Kobo Clara HD (2018) vs. Lastly, we averaged out all of their review ratings and observed that the Kobo Clara HD (2018), with its 8.2 average, performed considerably better than most E-readers - the mean score for the product category being 7.6 out of 10 - while the Kobo Nia (2020) managed an average of 7.6. We learned that the Kobo Clara HD (2018) got reviewed the highest by PCmag - it gave it a rating of 9, while the Kobo Nia (2020) most impressed reviewers at Lifewire, which gave it a score of 8.4. We also took a look at which sources had the best things to say about them. PCmag and Good e-Reader, for example, preferred the Kobo Clara HD (2018), while Lifewire, Techradar,, and TrustedReviews rated both of them the same. To get a better idea of how they fare when compared directly to each other, we analyzed review scores of sources that tested both. In fact, it was named "Best for Overdrive and Libby" and "Best: Budget ereader" in their respective roundups, which points to it being a product worthy of consideration. Moving on to the Kobo Nia (2020): it was loved by The Spruce and The Independent - two reliable sources that conduct their own in-depth testing. That alone makes it at least worth considering. It did great in their roundups - it was dubbed "Best Kindle Alternative" by The Spruce, "Best: Mid-range ereader" by The Independent, and "The best non-Amazon, touch screen ereader" by. The Kobo Clara HD (2018) was highly praised by reviewers from numerous sources that perform their own objective hands-on testing, including The Spruce, The Independent,, Good Housekeeping, Popular Mechanics, The Sleep Judge, and.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |